نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 کارشناسی ارشد، گروه مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.
2 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
مزیت رقابتی یک سازمان را میتوان توانایی در نظر گرفت که سازمان از طریق استفاده از منابع و ویژگیهایش، به عملکردی بالاتر از رقبایش در همان بازار دست مییابد. ایجاد مزیت رقابتی پایدار در محیط پویای امروزی، مستلزم بهینهسازی همزمان یک استراتژی اکتشاف و بهرهبرداری در سازمان است. هدف مقاله حاضر، بررسی چگونگی تاثیرگذاری دوسوتوانی سازمانی به عنوان استراتژی مکمل میان قابلیتهای پویا و کسب مزیت رقابتی پایدار است. دوسوتوانی سازمانی، قابلیتهای پویا و مزیت رقابتی پایدار مفاهیمی میباشند که قرابت نزدیکی با هم دارند. متاسفانه، تا کنون درک مناسبی از رابطه بین این سه مفهوم وجود ندارد. هدف مقاله حاضر ارائه توضیحات نظری از رابطه میان قابلیتهای پویا، دوسوتوانی سازمانی و مزیت رقابتی پایدار است. پس از بررسیهای زیاد، نگارندگان دریافتند که دوسوتوانی سازمانی میتواند به عنوان متغیر میانجی نقش ارتباطی میان قابلیتهای پویا و مزیت رقابتی پایدار را ایفا نماید. سازمانهایی که بر روی توسعه استراتژی دوسوتوانی خود تمرکز میکنند، میتوانند نسبت به سازمانهایی که ارزش پیشنهادی خود را تغییر میدهند، از طریق توسعه قابلیتهای پویای خود به مزیت رقابتی پایدار دست یابند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
The Investigation Role of Organizational Ambidexterity on Sustainable Competitive Advantage and Dynamic Capabilities
نویسندگان [English]
- Reza Mohammadi 1
- Masoud Kasaee 2
1 M.A, Department of Management and Accounting, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran .
2 Associate Professor, Department of Management and Accounting, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]
An organization’s competitive advantage can be viewed as the ability, gained through resources and attributes, to perform at a higher level than competitors in the same market. Establishing a Sustainable Competitive Advantage in today’s dynamic environment involves optimizing an organization’s exploration and exploitation strategy. This paper aims to explore how an Organization’s Ambidexterity complements the Dynamic Capabilities strategy in attaining a Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Organizational Ambidexterity, Sustainable Competitive Advantage and Dynamic Capabilities are closely related concepts. Unfortunately, there is still a lack of understanding about the relation between the three. This paper aims to offer a theoretical explanation of the relationship between Dynamic Capabilities, Organizational Ambidexterity and Sustainable Competitive Advantage. The authors find that organizational ambidexterity may be considered as a mediator in the relationship between Sustainable Competitive Advantage and Dynamic Capabilities. Organizations that focus on develop their ambidextrous strategy, can achieve a sustainable competitive advantage through developing their dynamic capabilities by which organizations change their value proposition.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Organizational Dynamic Capabilities
- Organizational Ambidexterity
- Sustainable Competitive Advantage
- Petrochemical Industry
Askari, Ahmed; Tahirpur police station, Habib-oleh; Miri, Abdul Reza. (2019). Introducing the model of dynamic capabilities in transforming threats into opportunities and creating a competitive advantage in the Iranian Army, Defense Strategy Scientific Quarterly, 18th year, number 69, pp. 67-91.
Azizi, Firuzeh; Naini, Ali; Moseibi, Alireza. (2017). Sustainable competitive advantage and the organization's brand image: explaining the role of marketing strategy and customer social interactions, Organizational Resource Management Research, Volume 8, Number 4, pp. 89-110.
Balochi, Hossein; Maleki Min Bash Rozgah, Morteza; Faiz, Daoud; Hasanqolipour, Tahmurt. (2018). Investigating the impact of dynamic capabilities on organizational performance through the mediation of marketing and technical capabilities and investigating the moderating role of environmental changes, Scientific Journal of Business Strategies, 26th year, number 13, pp. 118-99.
Basaqzadeh, Narjes; Moradi, Mahmoud; Tamimi, Mohammad. (2019). Explaining the competitive advantage of Iran's export companies with the approach of dynamic capability theory and organizational ambidexterity, International Business Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, Tabriz University, third year, number 1, pp. 21-44.
Birkinshaw, J., Zimmermann, A., & Raisch, S. (2016). How do firms adapt to discontinuous change? Bridging the dynamic capabilities and ambidexterity perspectives. California Management Review, Vol. 58, No. 4, pp. 36– 58.
Gupta, A.K., Smith, K.G. and Shalley, C.E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 49, pp. 693-706.
Johannes, W. F. C., Lieshout, V., Jeron, M., Velden V. D., Blomme, R. J., & Peters, P. (2021). The interrelatedness of organizational ambidexterity, dynamic capabilities and open innovation: a conceptual model towards a competitive advantage, European Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 26, NO. 2/3, pp. 39-62.
Jurksiene, L., & Pundziene, A. (2016). The relationship between dynamic capabilities and firm competitive advantage: The mediating role of organizational ambidexterity, European Business Review, Vol. 28, Issue 4.
Khamsa, Abbas; Ebrahimi-Najad, Fatah-Mirza. (1400). Identifying the effect of organizational ambidexterity on innovation capability (case study: companies located in Pardis Technology Park), Entrepreneurship Knowledge Quarterly, Volume 1, Number 1, pp. 25-40.
Khan, Z., Amankwah-Amoah, J., Lew, Y. K., Puthusserry, P., & Czinkota, M. (2020). Strategic ambidexterity and its performance implications for emerging economies multinationals. International Business Review, 101762, 101762
Lubatkin, M.H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y. and Veiga, J.F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small to medium-sized firms: the pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration, Journal of Management, Vol. 32, pp. 646-672.
Mattes, F. and Ohr, R. C. (2013), Balancing Innovation Via Organizational Ambidexterity –Part 3”, Innovation Management Online Concepts.
Mohammadi, Reza. (2016). Investigating the relationship between knowledge management and organizational performance in project-oriented organizations, Bimonthly Journal of Applied Studies in Management and Development Sciences, second year, number one (series: 3), pp. 1-14.
Mohammadi, Reza. (2018). Project management dashboard design in project-oriented organizations, the third international conference on applied research in structural engineering and construction management, Sharif University of Technology, July 2018.
Mom, T., Chang, Y.-Y., Cholakova, M. and Jansen, J.J.P. (2019). A multilevel integrated framework of firm HR practices, individual ambidexterity, and organizational ambidexterity, Journal of Management, Vol. 45, pp. 3009-3034.
Musakhani, Morteza; Alwani, Seyed Mehdi; Mahmoudzadeh, Ibrahim; Ali-Dadi Takhlestani, Yaser. (2019). The effect of the dynamic capabilities of two-way capabilities on commercialization in a defense organization, Strategic Defense Studies Quarterly, 18th year, number 80, pp. 257-282.
Nowrozi, Hossein; Nusrat Panah, Rasul; Barani, Samad. (1401). The impact of digital leadership on the performance of companies in dynamic environments: the role of dynamic capabilities, business model innovation and sustainable competitive advantage, Business Management, Volume 14, Number 3, pp. 445-474.
Nowrozi, Hossein; Nusrat Panah, Rasul; Ismailpour, Ismail. (1401). The impact of dynamic capabilities on the performance of companies through the mediation of business model innovation and competitive advantage, Innovation Management and Operational Strategies, Volume 3, Number 3, pp. 278-296.
O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 324– 338.
Pereira, V., Mellahi, K., Temouri, Y., Patnaik, S., & Roohanifar, M. (2019). Investigating dynamic capabilities, agility, and knowledge management within EMNEs-longitudinal evidence from Europe. Journal of Knowledge anagement, Vol. 23, No. 9, pp. 1708– 1728.
Said Kalali, Nader; Aghazadeh, Hashem. (1401). Cognitive foundations and dynamic capabilities to support the duality of innovation in information technology companies, Technology Development Management Quarterly, 10th volume, number 1, pp. 10-36.
Sajjadi, Hamid; Hamidian, Mohsen; Ismail Zadeh Moghri, Ali. (1401). Presenting a model of evaluating the long-term performance of commercial banks based on the approach of sustainable competitive advantage, Scientific Research Quarterly Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing, Volume 11, Number 2 (42 series), pp. 71-85.
Sakhdari, Kamal; Abedini, Hassan. (1400). Identifying the impact of individual characteristics on the contextual ambivalence behaviors of employees, Change Management Research Journal, 13th year, number 26, pp. 1-18.
Simsek, Z. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: towards a multilevel understanding, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 46, pp. 597-624.
Tahmasabi, Reza; Mirzamani, Azam; Borumand, Mojtaba. (2017). Presenting the human resources management framework of the Dosutvan Organization, Human Resource Management Research Quarterly of Imam Hossein University (AS), 10th year, number 4 (34 series), pp. 75-100.
Talafi Dariani, Mojtabi; Heydari, Ali; Haji Haydari, Nastern. (2018). The use of vocabulary co-occurrence analysis in examining the semantic realm of customerism between two theoretical perspectives (case study: dynamic capabilities and duality), information management, volume 5, number 2, pp. 197-219.
Tempelaar, M.P. and Rosenkranz, N.A. (2019). Switching hats: the effect of role transition on individual ambidexterity, Journal of Management, Vol. 45, pp. 1517-1539.
Weiss, L., & Kanbach, D. K. (2022). Toward an integrated framework of corporate venturing for organizational ambidexterity as a dynamic capability, Management Review Quarterly, Vol. 72, pp. 1129-1170.
)